Search for: "Childs v. Childs"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 28,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
” In assessing the adequacy of these redaction, the Court of Appeal considered this point from the judgment of Baroness Hale in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] UKSC 4): “In making the proportionality assessment under article 8, the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:15 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, termination of parental rights) In re M.H. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:36 pm
Department of Child Safety (Indian Child Welfare Act - Placement)U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 7:05 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
Stanton v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm
A criminal defendant may commit the offense of Endangering the Welfare of a Child through a single act or through multiple acts over a period of time (see People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, 421 [1986]). [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:12 am
Clair County's Family Court; the family court judge that ruled in Mother's favor to allow a significant modification of the parenting schedule was reversed by the Court of Appeals.In Burke v Lobodzinski, the family court judge sided with Mother in her petition to modify the child's week-on-week-off parenting schedule, allowing Mother to move with the child from Bay City to Troy. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 10:30 pm
A recent, non-binding Pennsylvania custody case, H.M. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:38 am
Parents who consented retained their status as a “fit parent” and were entitled to the Troxel v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:45 am
The landmark Supreme Court case of Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 4:44 pm
The State of Louisiana filed for reharing in Louisiana v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
SEARCH & SEIZUREUnited States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 9:34 am
Dictaphones on a high shelf, ipads behind a toy… it might not be right, but I don’t think its uncommon – what is uncommon is the level of planning, secrecy and the extent of the invasion of privacy that the child in M v F underwent. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:07 pm
Saldivar v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:09 am
That was the question answered by the court in Rolseth v. [read post]
