Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 5481 - 5500 of 17,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2013, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  And the possibility of increased enforcement activity also implies the possibility of follow on civil litigation, as investor claimants pursue private civil actions to recover from companies and their senior management for violating the securities laws or allowing the violations to take place. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 11:27 am by David Kravets
The decision came days after a government audit showed the telecom companies and FBI collaborated for four years, between 2003 and 2007, to violate federal wiretapping laws. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:11 pm
On the other hand, it is left for the defendants merely to establish a break in the link. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:35 am by Ted Allen
That provision would require companies disclose the ratio between total CEO compensation and the median pay for all other employees. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:30 pm
This past Friday Vanessa Cantley and Nathan Williams secured a $330,000 jury verdict for their client in a Jefferson County, Kentucky courtroom. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:30 am
  The consolidated amended complaint alleged that the defendants had falsely claimed that the company was an independent and impartial body, while in fact the company’s arrangements for rating asset-backed securities and other structured investments put it in a conflict of interest and compromised its independence. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:44 am by Rachel Bercovitz
An EU document outlining the bloc’s response strategy calls for securing “demonstrable assurances” from the U.S. that sanctions would not target the interests of Western energy companies, and raises the possibility of invoking an EU regulation to defend against U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:04 pm by Matthew Nied
The case arose when the plaintiffs subpoenaed Google, the parent company of the blogging service used by the anonymous defendants (see: news article). [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:01 am by Seán Binder
At least four companies facing new curbs belong to a Chinese surveillance camera maker. [read post]
29 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Michael V. Caracappa
This opinion illustrates the high threshold litigants must satisfy to secure sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2). [read post]
29 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Michael V. Caracappa
This opinion illustrates the high threshold litigants must satisfy to secure sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2). [read post]
29 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Michael V. Caracappa
This opinion illustrates the high threshold litigants must satisfy to secure sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2). [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 2:17 pm
The site's security measures Stottlemire was able to circumvent are solely intended to prevent users from printing additional, unauthorized copies of coupons. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 4:18 am by David DePaolo
CRM is named as a defendant in two of them, although Majestic Capital, CRM's parent company, declared insolvency in April 2011.A suit similar to the current New York broker complaint was dismissed in California.The 3rd District Court of Appeal upheld summary judgment, explaining that the only obligation a broker owes a client is to procure legitimate coverage. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:25 pm by Joe Mullin
Given the high cost of patent litigation, defendant companies are usually open to entertaining RPX's sales pitch, and comparing what RPX has to offer to what they'll get by paying law firms to defend them in court. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:35 am
The initiation of a criminal investigation against a company or its directors and officers can be a watershed moment in the life of any company. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:28 am
Based on undisputed facts, it reasoned that the debtor, Tribune Company (“Tribune”) “was a ‘customer’ of CTC” [Computershare Trust Company, N.A.]; CTC was “acting as Tribune’s ‘agent or custodian’… ‘in connection with a securities contract’“; and that both entities were a “financial institution” as defined by the Code. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:39 am
"But in its registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission July 31, the company had warned that a negative ruling in the case could expose it to greater competition, saying: "The outcome of this litigation is unknown and, if we are unsuccessful, competitors may be legally entitled to use certain proprietary technologies that have historically given us a competitive advantage in the marketplace. [read post]