Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 8,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Forever 21, Inc. (12/20/12) 212 Cal.App.4th 221, review granted 3/20/13 (Case No. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
But if the judge rules against defendant, the trial goes on, and the defendant isn’t entitled to immediately appeal; the defendant has to wait for the appeal until after trial, when the losing party can indeed appeal. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:44 am
One provision in the agreements seems to authorize defendant Todd Roberts to contract with and retain defendant TMR Bayhead Securities, LLC, which he wholly owned, notwithstanding any other provision. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
California has sent 19 more defendants to death row: The majority of defendants are people of color. 15 of the 19 defendants are Hispanic (11) or Black (4) The majority of defendants come from two counties in the state. 13 of the 19 death sentences were imposed in Los Angeles (7) and Riverside (6) counties None of the defendants sentenced in those counties are white: 9 are Hispanic, 3 are Black, 1 is “Other” The National Registry of… [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
The relevant factors within each category are now reviewed: 1. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Thus, the legal issue in this case is not complex — but that does not mean the stakes are low. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:56 pm
This court would, therefore, grant defendant's application for a downward departure to Level 1. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
No. 1). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
But `[m]ere presence during the commission of a crime . . . does not constitute aiding and abetting. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:58 pm
” Correction Law § 168–d(1)(a)(emphasis supplied). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
(See the cites at page 20 & note 12 of the ACC brief.) [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Part 1 begins by situating the problem within a decades-old liability debate that began with a focus on life-critical systems malfunctions and has in recent years expanded to exploits. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:07 am
Thus, in the last several decades suits for common-law dissolution almost always are brought by minority shareholders holding non-voting shares or holding less than 20% voting shares. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 4:13 pm
As this does not amount to clear and convincing evidence of the victim's age, 20 points should not have been assessed. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 10:37 am
Client does not want to settle. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:58 pm
On April 1, 2010, after a hearing, defendant was designated a level three sexually violent offender under SORA. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:28 pm
Order ¶20. [read post]
