Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 11,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am
The case in question was Fenty & Ors v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd, decided in the Court of Appeal in the early days of 2015, which dealt with the sale of a simple article of clothing; a t-shirt. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
The Chamber decision in the case, Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:53 am
There is some precedent for such an expansion in English and U.S. law. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
He is mostly famed for his work in the 1930s on English Public Law. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
However, his state law claims failed (Hannah v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Carter v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
For the most part it shadows the structure of the 2013 Act, but does suggest some notable alternatives to aspects of the English legislation. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
As a federal court ruled in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 10:15 am
Red Bull GmbH v OHIM, Case T-78/13, is one of those decisions that is too small to give a whole blogpost to, but too interesting to ignore completely. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
[Hat Tip: Co-blogger Bob V]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
Green and IMAX v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
The journalist who broke the story of Nisman’s murder was Damian Pachter, of the English-language Buenos Aires Herald. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:12 am
Camarero, both from the University Jaume I (Castellón) have addressed the ECtHR decision SAS v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
” This position was confirmed recently by the Court of Appeal (CA) in Fenty v Arcadia, who upheld Rihanna’s $5 million claim in passing off against the British fashion retailer, Topshop, but denied the existence of an image right under English law. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am
In the recent rulings of McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58 and Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 41 the Supreme Court overturned an appellate court for interfering with a trial judge’s findings of fact. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
| Dutch diverge with English as Novartis prevails on Zoledronic Acid in Netherlands | Slogan and TMs | The coffee capsule wars | Declining public trust in innovation | IPEC’s ruling in Global Flood Defence Systems & Another v Van den Noort Innovations BV & Others | Again on CJEU ruling in Case C-419/13 Art & Allposters | Biotech financing: the risk components, ‘going long’ and patents as knowledge currency. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:22 am
") AC35758 - State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:21 pm
” The postscript to the reported judgment of Seagrove v. [read post]
