Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 5481 - 5500 of 30,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2012, 7:06 pm by Heidi Meinzer
This would not be the first K-9 case in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_00446.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning the due process rights of public employees in New York State served disciplinary charges [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_00446.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from The Discipline Book concerning the due process rights of public employees in New York State served disciplinary charges [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Failures in such proof provide a steady steam of legal malpractice inquiies, and fuel much plaintiff suspicion that the law is either not fair, or that their attorney could have done a better job. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm by Howard Knopf
One new thing that he does add is to frontally take on Judge Pierre Leval and Bill Patry – both towering authorities on the subject of fair use, and cited as such by the Supreme Court of the United States in the pivotal Campbell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Turning to Thompson's claims against DC-37 for an alleged breach of the unions duty of fair representation, the Appellate Division ruled that her actions was "likewise untimely under the applicable four-month limitations period. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Turning to Thompson's claims against DC-37 for an alleged breach of the unions duty of fair representation, the Appellate Division ruled that her actions was "likewise untimely under the applicable four-month limitations period. [read post]