Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 5481 - 5500 of 9,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2014, 5:00 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
rh=1#storylink=cpy"Texas sues feds over guidelines re: hiring felonsThe Houston Chronicle published an item about the state of Texas' lawsuit, filed late last year, contesting the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's "new guidelines designed to give ex-offenders a chance to be considered for a job," arguing that "The EEOC urges employers to determine in each case whether the disqualification is job-related and a business necessity, and to consider such factors as the… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:17 am by SHG
  Judge Kopf explained that we’re “both pigs and prudes. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
We’re holding a seminar on professionalism and ethics for judges at the School of Government next week so I’ve got judicial canons on my mind. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In Wal-Mart, the new rule was designed to limit the post-Taco Cabana flood of unmeritorious claims. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:42 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
The consolidated cases are In Re: Coloplast Corp Pelvic Support System Products Liability Litigation, 12-md-2387, U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:15 am by Juan C. Antúnez
One of those tools is defensive drafting designed to be so blindingly obvious that no one — not even a judge who thinks your will is morally reprehensible — will have any doubt it’s exactly what your client wanted. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:15 am
Robert Goodin notes that disputes over beliefs are occasionally resolved through persuasion, but more often they’re “resolved” through negotiation. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 7:30 pm by Brian Galbraith
  You’re living together but there’s no divorce and you’re undecided whether or not your current relationship will lead to marriage. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:39 pm by Andrew Crocker
  So you’re out of luck if you wanted to send your friend a link to Wikipedia, because the encyclopedia contains a fair number of articles containing nudity. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:01 am by Andrew Frisch
In Rooney, the court held that a police lieutenant satisfied all of the requirements for designation as an exempt executive employee. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:32 pm by Ron Friedmann
One is to use CAM to teach or re-teach the system. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
  Remember, we’re supposedly dealing with a state-law (here, Wisconsin) product liability claim. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
Additionally, the blog will feature articles designed to walk you through the various processes of reporting discrimination or harassment in order to help you decide whether you’re ready to move forward. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:40 am by Ron Coleman
Read that excerpt again, then re-read it; then email it to your favorite federal judge — and your favorite client or prospective client, or non-specialist lawyer dabbling in trademark, who can’t understand why the PTO doesn’t understand the difference between his spelling that uses a “z” and the other guy’s pre-existing registration that uses an “s”. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:40 am by Ron Coleman
 In true ghost-branding fashion, they haven’t done a thing about it for all that time, and shy they’re not. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
YT’s takedown procedure is now so much better, but now it says “this video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Maria Schneider,” plus a sadface; that’s designed to send animosity to me but uploader can use a username. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am by MBettman
But the Chief also wanted to underscore the fact that judges have great discretion in sentencing, and that nothing in this decision changes that. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
The patent challenge proceedings of the AIA (IPR, CBM and PGR) were specifically designed, at least in part, to remedy the pendency issue. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:13 am by Dennis Crouch
Question Re-framed: An abstract idea, including a fundamental economic concept, is not eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]