Search for: "Insurance Companies A,B" Results 5481 - 5500 of 8,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 11:02 am by Steve Bainbridge
In Business Roundtable v SEC, for example, which struck down the SEC's proxy access rule, the court explained that: We agree with the petitioners and hold the Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously for having failed once again — as it did most recently in American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:23 pm by Cary Coglianese
 He definitively laid out the compromise that, “[u]nder the rule” he was announcing, insurance companies rather than religious nonprofits would need to pay for contraceptives. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Joey Fishkin
  (For insurance companies, this is not such a bad deal. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 am by Dan
This plan B is going to depend on your company and your situation. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:30 am by Stanley D. Baum
The regulations would affect individuals for whom a longevity annuity contract is purchased under these plans or IRAs (and their beneficiaries), sponsors and administrators of these plans, trustees and custodians of these IRAs, and insurance companies that issue longevity annuity contracts under these plans and IRAs. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
They cited the Exchange Act’s Section 10(b), which establishes an investor’s private right of action to file a lawsuit against an insurer for deceitful/fraudulent statements and actions allegedly committed when selling securities. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm by Kurt Holzer
If you have purchased collision coverage, we recommend that you go through your own insurance company. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:09 am by William Carleton
This exemption shall not be available to any of the following: (A) A foreign issuer; (B) An investment company, as defined in Section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940; (C) A development stage company that either has no specific business plan or purpose or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person; or (D) A company with… [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm by Sara Thorpe
§ 1109(b); (2) have a traceable interest in the outcome as required by Article III of the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:12 am by Nicole Vinson
But compare this to section 15(b), which states that a public adjuster may not restrict or prevent an insurer or its representative from reasonable access at reasonable times to an insured or the insured property. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:55 am by Drake Law Firm
In the above example, you can receive workers comp benefits from the insurance carrier for ABC Company and maintain a suit against XYZ Company for all the things Alabama's workers comp doesn't provide, such as compensation for future lost wages, loss of earning capacity, mental anguish, pain and suffering, etc. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:49 pm
April 12, 2011, CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,577) after losing throughout the unemployment compensation administrative process on the issue of whether a concrete artisan who had been an employee and then became a licensed dealer was still an employee for purposes of unemployment insurance, the dealer filed a court proceeding. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:13 pm
My research into what different Texas liability insurance companies are charging drivers shows that there is a huge difference in rates that are being charged. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:28 am by admin
The federal “obstruction of criminal investigations” law is even less helpful to prosecutors: it contains anti-subpoena-disclosure provisions that apply only to higher-ups at financial institutions and insurance companies. [read post]