Search for: "Johnson v. State " Results 5481 - 5500 of 8,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2008, 5:47 am by David Conforto
Other cases applying an “agency” theory to protect whistleblowers working for private subsidiaries of publicly traded companies include: Johnson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Some Appellate Division decisions, on which the Appellate Division here relied, have applied strict privity to estate planning malpractice lawsuits commenced by the estate's personal representative and beneficiaries alike (Deeb v Johnson, 170 AD2d 865 [3d Dept 1991]; Spivey, 138 AD2d at 564; Viscardi v Lerner, 125 AD2d 662, 663-664 [2d Dept 1986]; Rossi v Boehner, 116 AD2d 636 [2d Dept 1986]). [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
For this reason, we imagine that if a Johnson-like dispute arose in South Carolina, the result may very well be the same in the Palmetto State as it was in Oregon.In Sims, at issue was the status of a meter reader entering a utility customer's property and the concordant standard of care owed by the landlord to the meter reader. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
The 1773 edition of Samuel Johnson’s dictionary defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:17 am by Michael C. Dorf
TarrowWhen, on June 24th, the Supreme Court effectively liquidated Roe v Wade, scholars of social movements and abortion rights shook their heads – but not in disbelief. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am by Orin Kerr
I’m also not sure it makes sense to apply the Franks v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
” This is not simply stirring rhetoric; it represents a repudiation of the elegiac yet resigned attitude toward Native dispossession that has marked the Court’s Indian law decisions as far back as Johnson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:15 pm by Bridget Crawford
Am., Inc., 971 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1992) (publicity rights) Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:54 pm
Justice Johnson did not participate. [read post]