Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 21,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 12:25 am
The eviction finally went ahead 8 weeks after the original date by which time I had incurred further solicitor’s fees and paid a locksmith twice. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
The Cap on Punitive Damages Does it matter that there are two defendants, and that both were found liable for the compensatory damages, but only one (Village Green) for the punitive damages, asked Justice French? [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:08 am
James:In this medical malpractice and wrongful death action, defendants allegedly failed to timely diagnose and treat plaintiff’s aortic dissection. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:08 am
James:In this medical malpractice and wrongful death action, defendants allegedly failed to timely diagnose and treat plaintiff’s aortic dissection. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
In Dirks, the Supreme Court held that, under the “classical theory” of insider trading liability,[ii] tippers are liable—and, by extension, tippees are liable—only when tippers breach a duty to the shareholders of a publicly traded company. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:42 am
Plaintiffs must prove their case by the preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not that the defendant’s negligence led to the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
" The court emphasized that "the property owner's duty does not arise solely by virtue of its contractual relationship to the tenant and neither the LLC's duty nor the defendant's duty arises solely from the property management agreement. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Lora Jarrell says the defendants accelerated the patient’s physical deterioration, which involved a number of emotional and physical traumas (congestive heart failure, falls, malnutrition, and medication diversion). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:28 am
The defendants are bus driver Tracy A. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:42 pm
In their motion to dismiss, the brand name defendants argued that the plaintiffs' claims were governed by the PLA, “and that pursuant to the PLA and New Jersey case law, manufacturers of a brand-name drug may not be held liable for injuries caused by a plaintiff's use of a generic drug manufactured by another company. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:28 pm
Proving a cause-in-fact means proving that the other party’s actions were the actual cause of the damages, whereas legal cause means proving that the defendant’s actions were sufficiently related to the damages to hold the party liable. [read post]
4 May 2016, 11:46 am
The defendant’s medical expert argued that the plaintiff’s spinal surgeries were unnecessary. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:15 am
Analogizing to a speechwriter, the majority ruled that an investment adviser is not liable under Rule 10b-5 if it provides misleading information that the adviser's client uses in a prospectus. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 11:43 pm
The court found that the defendants were liable for the claimant’s damages. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:38 am
We remand for reconsideration of whether all three defendants are liable for prejudgment interest from the same date. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:54 am
In its complaint, filed by Indiana copyright litigators, Plaintiffs allege the following: Count I: Copyright InfringementCount II: Trade Dress Infringement and Unfair Competition under the Lanham ActCount III: Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition and Deceptive Trade PracticesCount IV: ConversionCount IV [sic]: Misappropriation of Advertising Ideas and Style of Doing BusinessCount V: Tortious Interference with Contract or Business Relationship Plaintiffs ask the court: that… [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm
” By contrast, if the defendant independently created the allegedly misappropriated item with only “slight” contribution from the plaintiff’s trade secret, then the defendant is not liable for misappropriation. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:39 am
Thus, a defendant that performs at least one of the steps of a method patent, and promotes another to perform the remaining steps would be found liable under the Limelight test. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 4:13 pm
The issue in this case is whether defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the compliant should be granted. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:03 pm
It is that simple, because a copyright plaintiff's motivation matters, especially if the defendant prevails. [read post]
