Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 5481 - 5500 of 10,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2010, 3:01 am by charonqc
Alex Hilton has gotten away with his tactics and Robert Dougans looked like a clown who spend most of his time stammering and didn’t know what he was doing. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 12:38 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Of course, I have seen no internal memos, so I don’t know how this is being framed as a legal matter; I’m offering my best guess. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 1:03 pm
Pappas, please see:[www.gulf1.com]Copyright © June 11th, 2009, by Robert L. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:33 pm
The Best court said it didn't matter - insofar as Best's liability for treason was concerned - whether he aided the enemy because he thought the U.S. would benefit more from being defeated by Germany than by defeating Germany. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by Jean Galbraith, Benjamin Schwartz
Finally, we dropped other separation-of-powers objections that didn’t fit neatly into any of these categories (e.g., an anti-aggrandizement principle) into a catch-all “other” category. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:29 pm by Sasha Volokh
Of course Harvard is a private organization, so they can do whatever they want, and as a legal matter, I agree that they should be able to do whatever they want. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:13 am by Daniel Shaviro
  And while of course we won’t precisely know this in any real world example, at least it gives us a useful framework for  thinking about the proper design of a pollution tax.In the case of inequality, we don’t know which types matter the most, whether the marginal harm rises in any sort of continuous fashion, or really anything about how best to price it. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:25 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
One of the things I love about teaching and writing in intellectual property is that disputes often don't fall along traditional party lines. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
 A more pessimistic reading of the argument is that the conservative Justices didn't ask about the removal or nondelegation issues because they don't think they will need to reach them, as they plan to rule for Jarkesy on the Seventh Amendment ground. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 8:39 am by Lovechilde
  A liberal majority on the Supreme Court with no Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Alioto. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:27 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
We suspected this before as a matter of inference from the fact, reported in the Nunes memo, that the warrant was renewed three times. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm by rainey Reitman
The judges who sit on this court are hand picked by the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, that's currently Justice Roberts. [read post]