Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 12:19 am
” Neubronner v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(E.g., People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:44 pm
Counsel stated that Philips "can introduce evidence, live evidence to this Court at trial. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
The ruling in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:45 pm
Astro-Med, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
(EPLAW) Thrombin JM - Pharma company avoids injunction by dropping competitive keyword ads: King v ZymoGenetics (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Vytorin (Ezetimibe, Simvastatin) - US: Schering files patent infringement complaint against Mylan following Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) Xeloda (Capecitabine) - US: Hoffmann-La Roche files patent infringement complaint against Roxane following Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm
Supreme Court's ruling, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc, v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:21 pm
C-Tech Wholesale, Inc., CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶31,962. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 10:09 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:46 pm
Bergman, 2009 BCSC 978 at para. 70, Gray J. stated that the seven day period "has been applied in the case law. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:23 am
(CCH RICO Business Disputes Guide ¶11,500)-which states that reliance is not required in RICO mail fraud actions-to cases involving third-party reliance. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:09 pm
In Quan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:55 pm
Marioni, 2009 BCSC 686 at para 35; Schmitt v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:33 am
The decision is Roberts v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:12 pm
The December 4 opinion in Kinetic Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
Seley v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
