Search for: "People v J."
Results 5481 - 5500
of 7,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2010, 12:52 am
Qualtex, one of the UK's less successful IP litigants in recent years (see here and here), must have had the smile wiped from their own faces when they lost again -- this time in Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 1237 (C), a Chancery Division ruling from Mr Justice Floyd on 28 May.In this action Numatic sued Qualtex for passing off. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:14 am
CTB -v- Twitter, Inc. and Persons Unknown (Case No. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:13 pm
And the circumstances surrounding the "Marshall v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:01 am
Malloy and Peter J. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:52 pm
The practice of Nicholas J. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:38 pm
J. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
United States of America v James J. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:52 am
Judge Wood also relied in part upon a wide interpretation of the Supreme Court’s 1967 ruling in Loving v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
It was the subject of a recent Supreme Court case, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 5:40 am
Clayton J. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:10 pm
Newville and Alexandra V. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:20 am
No, cops don’t slaughter all black people in the streets like dogs. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:30 am
J. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm
That’s funny – especially because the name of the company that makes the totes is My Other Bag, a play on the “My other car is a ” bumper stickers people used to paste on beat-up cars. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:27 am
-Adrian J. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm
The ruling in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 2:49 pm
District Court, District of Hawaii (EEOC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
It is common within Latino communities for people to reject any resemblance of their native ancestry. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:56 am
Rochelle of Rochelle Law Offices, Casper, Wyoming Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Timothy J. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:00 am
The public trust doctrine has not been widely discussed in Canadian case law with the only significant mention being by the Supreme Court of Canada in British Columbia v. [read post]
