Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 5481 - 5500 of 7,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am by Richard Goldfarb
Unilever US, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 9. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:00 pm
The Department of Belatedly Blogged Interesting Niceties (DOBBIN) has finally got round to writing up Data Marketing and & Secretarial Ltd and Winning Deals Ltd v S & S Enterprises Ltd and Selective Marketplace Ltd [2014] EWHC 1499 (IPEC), a ruling of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Judge Hacon) for England and Wales way back on 16 May 2014, when this Kat's head was still full of the INTA Meeting in Hong Kong. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:21 pm
* 5 seconds of contact time is sufficient, says Arnold JDavid reports on Compactgtl Ltd v Velocys Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 2951 (Pat), an Arnoldian decision of the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The ACCG, meanwhile, slapped the government with discovery requests.Recent pleadings filed by both parties show just how wide the divide is between the two sides.The battle of U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:53 am by Josh Sturtevant
It seems incredible for so many reasons that I first published the reprinted post below over a year ago...The Dual Critical Role and Culpability of the Media in State v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., and Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Rounding out the week, Judge Pohl decided to schedule argument on the unclassified sections of motion 444 for the next commission session and assured Mr. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
Rounding out the new offerings, the Court relisted in yet another Armed Career Criminal Act, Espinoza v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 9:36 am
And yesterday's trial court opinion continues this -- paragraph 73 cites Dague v. [read post]