Search for: "Sayed v. Page" Results 5481 - 5500 of 12,185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Accordingly, even assuming, without deciding, that the Police Merit Commission could not amend the merit plan, we cannot say that Ind. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:48 pm by Brad Pauley
  But since Ernde’s article was published that is no longer quite accurate: the Chief authored a 27-page partial dissent from the Court’s otherwise unanimous opinion  in California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:12 am
(Remember the traveling show on Bush v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:13 pm
“Not very often,” says Chiappinelli. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:42 pm by nflatow
" Mukasey and Gonzales echo the concerns of several other commentators, who have expressed particular alarm over Gingrich’s attack on the landmark decision Cooper v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:33 pm
The article nicely sets out the current requirements for obtaining an L or F visa: [V]isit the Chinese embassy or consulate-general in the jurisdiction where you live and provide the following information: your passport (with at least six months of remaining validity and at least one blank visa page), a completed application form, one passport photo, round-trip air tickets and hotel reservations. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:19 pm
As a result, he says, Justice Roberts understated the costs of the rule when he wrote recently, in Herring v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:10 am
It’s indeed a very engaging presentation, and a fun (relevant) diversion on the number of Windows PCs v Apples in the room (it’s 50/50, or thereabouts…as opposed to the normal 95/5!). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:02 am by SHG
  That would be the language the Court of Appeals held unconstitutional in People v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 5:42 am
He is Irish and always has something to say about the weather. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The Times has also intoned against the decision in the op ed page the day after the ruling. [read post]