Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 5481 - 5500 of 18,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
S (A Child), R (on the application of) v Plymouth City Council [2009] EWHC 1499 (Admin) Not sure how we missed this one and thanks to the Legal Action housing updates for the elbow to the ribs. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by PaulKostro
Div. 2003) (in action to terminate parental rights, court exercises jurisdiction over a mother who remained in Haiti based on contact with DYFS, the State’s concern for child’s welfare, and mother’s request that child remain in New Jersey); Ali v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Kerry Abrams
What about the definitions of “parent” and “child”? [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 4:42 am by Kate Fort
Van Hunnick developed and implemented policies and procedures for the removal of Indian children from their parents’ custody in violation of the mandates of the Indian Child Welfare Act and in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The specific test for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits was set out in Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, where it was held that with questions of social and economic strategy the Court will generally respect the legislature’s policy choice unless it was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
Contracts -- Torts -- Jurisdiction -- Non-residents -- Law firm's action against former client for breach of contract and against former client's attorney for tortious interference with contract -- Allegations that out-of-state client breached contract with Florida attorneys by failing to make payment in state were sufficient to bring former client within ambit of long-arm statute -- Former client had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida where she voluntarily contracted with… [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 1:43 pm by Mark Ashton
  The Circuit decision notes that both Germany and the United States could claim status as this child’s habitual residence. [read post]