Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 5481 - 5500
of 6,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2008, 8:56 pm
Davis. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 5:08 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Patrick Davis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:31 pm
Judge Leonard Davis of Tyler authored Bocanegra v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:48 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Hugo Medina v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court prohibited the execution of the mentally retarded in Atkins v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:43 am
Supreme Court decision in Davis v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
26 May 2008, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
The conference was chaired by Edward Coleman of Surrett & Coleman of Augusta, Georgia and opening remarks were also made by Kurt Kegel of Davis Matthews and Quigley in Atlanta, Chair of the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia. [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:01 pm
Yet Washington v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:10 am
In Kentucky v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:00 am
" Davis v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:11 am
Davis, No. 06-666 (5/19/08)... [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Rainsford v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:28 am
Yesterday, the Court handed down the biggest decision of the term (measured by financial stakes), when it uphold Kentucky's tax exemption for interest on Kentucky's state and local bonds in Kentucky Dep't of Revenue v Davis (06-666) . [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:17 am
Before I end my blog holiday and come back from New York, I thought you might just be slightly interested in this US Supreme Court case showing that non-discriminatory inter-state commerce is protected in a way analogous to (thought different from, obviously) free movement law in the EU. [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:53 am
Paul Caron has analysis and a media roundup of yesterday's Supreme Court decision allowing states to discriminate in favor of... [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
Davis, a 7-2 majority of the Court held that the Commerce Clause does not prohibit a state from giving a tax preference to its citizens who own that state's bonds over its citizens who own another state's bonds. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:07 pm
Davis, No. 06-666 (5/19/08). [read post]
