Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 40,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Rather, today we will examine the recent decision handed down by United States District Court for the District of Kansas, Stephenson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
Parties’ submissions Firstly, Mr Robinson submitted that the line of authority beginning with Onibiyo [1996] EWCA Civ 1338 – which established that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal – did not survive the Supreme Court’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] UKSC 7. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
United States of America v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:16 pm
[The plaintiffs in Juliana v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:42 am
In Apodaca v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:15 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
See Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
” Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
This argument was based upon State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:22 am
The Ninth Circuit has handed down United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:37 am
And yet I can find no indication of when they will hand down their judgment in the eagerly-awaited (at least by family lawyers) case of Kernott v Jones.To recap, the issue to be decided by the Supreme Court, as stated on their website, is: Whether a court can properly infer an agreement by an unmarried couple, who hold a property in equal shares at the date of their separation, to the effect that thereafter their respective beneficial interests should alter.Quite an… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:15 am
– In United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:05 am
United States, which declared the Johnson rule substantive for purposes of the retroactivity analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:18 pm
United States, which declared the Johnson rule substantive for purposes of the retroactivity analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 8:18 am
The recent case of United States of America vs. [read post]
