Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 5481 - 5500 of 9,085
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:10 am by SHG
While the basic notion of judicial review, established by no less a dubious character than John Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:37 pm by Ronald Mann
Teva Pharmaceuticals, the Supreme Court’s first patent case of the year, breaks no new ground. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:06 am
On this view, the historical arguments in cases such as District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
§ 1391, which provides that the judicial district where the defendant resides, among other options, is a proper venue. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
§ 1391, which provides that the judicial district where the defendant resides, among other options, is a proper venue. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
§ 1391, which provides that the judicial district where the defendant resides, among other options, is a proper venue. [read post]
19 May 2017, 8:00 am by Josh Blackman
The Court would not reach that conclusion until Bolling v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 5:59 am by Robert Kreisman
 In the Peterson case, the First District resolved an issue related on appeal bearing similar procedural circumstances as the Zamora case. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
This is where a private party says the government made a mistake, and I, private party, I am going to sue the government in the United States district court. [read post]