Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 5481 - 5500 of 9,718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm by Michael Geist
  S is for State Farm, which challenged the constitutionality of Canadian privacy law. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 3:05 am by Gmlevine
In the one case in which the court ruled against plaintiff on the cybersquatting claim for failing to state a claim, Carl v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm by Giles Peaker
At the end of the 12 months, the tenancy would automatically convert into an assured tenancy, provided that no steps had been taken to gain possession in the meantime. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:00 am by Hennadiy Kutsenko
Critique As stated, the views above may not necessarily be correct in law. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Adebayo Lanlokun, Olswang LLP
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of the legislation. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:59 am
Two cases taken by migrant domestic workers against the UK, Kawogo v UK  and CN v UK are currently pending in Strasbourg. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:09 pm
The change began in the 1970s at both the state and federal level (think Jerry Brown v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 12:18 pm
  As addressed above, there are two types of competition concerns, and one is "administrative monopolies" which refers to state-owned or state-run holding companies that gain market power through legitimate legislative or administrative means.[11] In China, a typical form of administrative monopoly occurs when state-owned enterprises have direct affiliation with a regulatory administrative agency and receives preferential treatment.[12] … [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
T-Series argues that this provision privileges the interests of broadcasters (who it claims have previously abused it for financial gain at the cost of copyright owners). [read post]