Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 11,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
Let’s talk about the decision in Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:44 am
PJI occurs in a very small percentage of all total joint replacement surgeries in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:04 am
Iowa, a state known for its valuable farmland, has developed three main theories of recovery for loss of trees: if the trees served a special purpose, the damages are the difference between the value of the realty before and after the destruction of the trees. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
According to this approach, Smith & Nephew’s product (which contains 0.77% binding agent) would fall within the scope of the claim.Smith & Nephew, on the other hand, argued that the limits of the claimed range were precisely as they were stated (i.e. a concentration of 0.999% would not fall within the scope of the claim). [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am
Caldwell, and filed an amicus brief on behalf of fifteen States in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
S. 558 (2003) and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
” He goes on, in an eloquent vein, not the more businesslike tone he took with his announcement in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
However, in some, the RNG is housed separately from the main machine cabinet (and in some cases one RNG is used to serve a number of machines), allowing them to fall short of the definition of a gaming machine in Note 3 and therefore be exempt from VAT. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
Estate of Frank Hegyi v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
The main claim at issue is a Swiss form claim, and although this is significant for the present case, much less turns on it than in the other saga ongoing at the moment of Warner Lambert v Actavis (latest instalment here). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:22 am
The ruling in the case of Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:14 am
NFIB v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
State Dental Ass’n, 843 A.2d 902, 906 (Md. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:42 pm
The National Highway Transportation Agency compiled statistics regarding motor vehicle v. pedestrian accidents. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:37 am
See, e.g., Morningstar, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
To the extent that the state court based its conclusion on the IQ score of 75, the Court cited Hall v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:59 pm
By Michael Borella -- Since late last year, the main theme of many 35 U.S.C. [read post]
