Search for: "State v. True"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 21,857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am
Some detriment must thereby have been suffered by C, or benefit accrued to D, sufficient to make it unconscionable for D to assert the true legal or factual position. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:48 pm
by Dennis Crouch Gellman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Westerfeld v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
(Jones v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
This can be true `whether under a search warrant or a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
That issue was raised by the state of California in Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In light of this conclusion—which, if true, would constitute a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:04 pm
Even if that is true as an historical matter, it does not get the plaintiffs where they need to go. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:34 am
Hughes)V. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:59 am
Profoot, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:51 am
I'm referring to Arizona v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:34 pm
Section V then focuses on the alternative to ideology and economic reform offered through Chinese Party and state practice. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
The closest one finds is the 14th Amendment, except that it only authorizes penal legislation applicable to state actors, not to private persons generally, and the offenders in this case were not state actors.The authority cited for all of these charges is the Commerce Clause, interpreted as authorizing criminal penalties under the Necessary and Proper Clause, mainly based on the Supreme Court precedent in Wickard v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 7:52 pm
In Marshall v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
TianRui v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
