Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 5481 - 5500
of 8,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Here is the abstract:This article explores the seminal United States Supreme Court decision of United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Today is the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
But that usage of "blessing" has constitutional text to support it: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
The myth of the isolationist United States is the myth that will not die. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
His persistence would change the face of criminal justice in the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
Consumers in America and around the world provide a huge market for California raisins: the state’s raisin industry supplies almost one hundred percent of U.S. consumption, and about forty percent of the world market. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:17 am
United States (D. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:17 am
United States (D. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
Motorola ruling is highly influential, Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington -- with support from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- has become the pioneer and thought leader in the U.S. with respect to the adjudication of FRAND licensing terms by federal courts through the substantive and procedural decisions has has already made in the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Pamela Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, & Artemus Ward, The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (Stanford Law Books, May 2013) Drawing on data from the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
This marks a radical departure from the United States’ previous method of giving priority of invention to the first inventor to invent. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
