Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 6,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2010, 1:25 pm
At issue in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
Since the Indiana Supreme Court’s 1996 decision in American States Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Schwantes, and David M. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:02 am
Emanating from Guantánamo yesterday:News stories reporting rumors that the military commissions case of United States of America v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
United States Dist. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:36 pm
” As Wikipedia also explains, “an insular area is a United States territory, that is neither a part of one of the fifty U.S. states nor the District of Columbia”. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
From 2001 to 2004, Olson was, unsurprisingly, Solicitor General of the United States following his victory in Bush v Gore which permitted President Bush to take office. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
Judge Susan Illston stated this was not a problem because the court could "group[] similar state laws together and apply[] them as a unit. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
But, Winston Churchill envisaged the United States of Europe. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
Notable exceptions were Boumediene and Citizens United, which both contravened public opinion. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:07 am
Click here to read the suit, Lyttle v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Meanwhile the annual IP Publishers and Editors lunch on 7 December, also in London (click here and scroll down for details) has gone one better, with 44 participants signed up from as far afield as the United States and Germany. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:08 am
At Tuesday’s oral argument in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:17 am
" The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:14 am
” The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:02 pm
(David Bernstein) to endorse what we would now call a “substantive” interpretation of the Due Process Clause was not, as is commonly held, Dred Scott v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:32 am
“It is one thing for a passerby to observe or even to follow someone during a single journey as he goes to the market or returns home from work,” Ginsburg wrote for the unanimous panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am
United States, a Tenth Amendment case, drew notice from David Kopel at the Volokh Conspiracy, CBS News, the Christian Science Monitor, and Crime & Consequences. [read post]
