Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 5481 - 5500 of 10,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am by Adam Thierer
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm by Ilya Somin
In so doing, however, she simply ignores the main arguments against the federal government’s position under that Clause: that the mandate is not “proper” even if “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five factor test recently applied by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
United States, 713 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
(Communication, para 4.1)Fully automated removal should be applied where the circumstances leave little doubt about the illegality of the material (such as where the removal is notified by law enforcement authorities). [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
   After saying that Congress has taxing power, the provision does say — without elaboration – that Congress also has the power “to provide for….the general welfare of the United States.” Congress customarily does not just hand out money to the states without strings attached. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
United States, which discussed reasons for a less strict adherence to the court’s past decisions, as an example of a theory deserving of addition scholarly and legal scrutiny. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:25 pm by Steve Vladeck
That question, in turn, became the dominant focus of the ten-minute argument by Assistant to the Solicitor General Zachary Tripp on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting Ross and the state. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no. 19859/04)STRASBOURG 9 February 2010This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
She is the author of Talking to Strangers[1] written in 2004 which focuses on interracial distrust in the United States. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm by Don Cruse
The opinion, in its own inimitable way, calls on the Texas Legislature to address the fragmented design of the Texas judiciary: Intrepidity at the Alamo; entering the United States as the Republic of Texas; fifty-eight Texas-born recipients of the Medal of Honor; Bob Wills and George Strait; Nolan Ryan and Babe Didrikson Zaharias; five Super Bowl titles (sadly none this millennium); Dr Pepper and the “little creamery” in Brenham; deep-fried anything at the… [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]