Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 6,310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
Amid mass school shootings in the United States, the public has called for better measures to ensure students’ safety. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 1:21 pm
United States, decided by the Supreme Court on April 4, 2016. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
Less familiar is a problem that is perhaps the obverse: plural and incompatible ways of generating claims to say “yes,” to give the final word on who shall rule and what the state shall do. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am
Now is it possible for the EU institutions to oversee an intergovernmental agreement pursued by a minority of States, supposedly not related to the EU Treaties? [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
First, religious liberty in the United States has never been absolute, but rather is hemmed in by the moral imperative to not harm others. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Kentucky, the Supreme Court ruled that failure of a defense attorney to inform a client that a collateral consequence of their felony plea could lead to the client’s (in this case, a forty-year permanent resident in the United States) deportation constituted deficient performance by the attorney.[8] Two years later, in Missouri v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
Secondly, the burden of regularly maintaining an AED (in accordance with all federal and state regulations) and trained personnel on-site was not minor or minimal, outweighing the need for same. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
There has been significant commentary and conjecture over the decision in R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor (see our post or read the judgment). [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 10:54 am
Human Rights Coalition v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
(Imagine if the ICJ ordered the United States not to build a wall on the Southern border!) [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am
Around the same time, the United States produced a plat that identified the (northern-more) area east of Michigan Avenue as “public ground for ever to remain vacant of buildings. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:30 am
Secondly, the burden of regularly maintaining an AED (in accordance with all federal and state regulations) and trained personnel on-site was not minor or minimal, outweighing the need for same. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:27 pm
As the United States Supreme Court articulated in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:58 pm
” Parkson v. [read post]
