Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 5501 - 5520
of 95,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2016, 8:44 am
Jurors in the first trial heard all the evidence and ultimately awarded plaintiff $629,000 (and his wife $110,000) in compensatory damages. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
Nor can it mean that plaintiffs can re-cast all of their run-of-the-mill claims as "negligence per se" and so avoid preemption. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
Plaintiffs asserted that if Merck had been truthful about the safety and efficacy of Vioxx, they would not have paid all or part of the cost of Vioxx prescribed to Michigan Medicaid beneficiaries, which cost them more than $20 million. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:59 am
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this elder abuse/personal injury case and its proceedings.) [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:49 pm
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the proceedings.) [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 5:04 pm
Court Discussion and Decision The facts of the case show that at all of the times that were provided the plaintiff was a resident in the state of New York. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:37 pm
Finally, plaintiffs deposition testimony does not establish that he was unable to perform substantially all of the material acts which constitute his usual and customary daily activities for not less than ninety days during the one hundred eighty days immediately following the occurrence of the injury. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:55 am
Judge Robinson granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss all of the plaintiffs’ claims on the grounds that the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged standing to sue in federal court and, in any event, had failed to state a claim for relief under any of the statutes invoked in their complaint.Lack of Article III Standing To establish Article III standing—a prerequisite to bringing a private lawsuit in federal… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:22 am
Having said that, I am satisfied that the evidence supports a finding that the disclosure of personal information caused the plaintiff a measure of annoyance, anxiety and distress.[34] Although Legal Aid Ontario provided a letter of apology, the defendant has not seen fit to do so.[35] After taking all of these factors into consideration, I award general damages in the amount of $10,000. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:47 pm
” The plaintiff’s primary argument in opposition to Delta’s motion was that the airline was required “to demonstrate as a matter of law that the Plaintiff was intoxicated” but that it had not presented any “real proof at all of Plaintiff’s purported intoxication,” such as the result of a Breathalyzer test. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:47 pm
” The plaintiff’s primary argument in opposition to Delta’s motion was that the airline was required “to demonstrate as a matter of law that the Plaintiff was intoxicated” but that it had not presented any “real proof at all of Plaintiff’s purported intoxication,” such as the result of a Breathalyzer test. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 8:36 am
Plaintiff rejected this request, knowing that his employment contract – and California law – required him to apply the same grading standards and requirements to all students. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
While the court largely rejected Defendants’ assertions, it did find in favor of Defendants--at least partially--with regard to the question of whether all of the accessed emails had been in “electronic storage”--a question that would affect liability under the SCA. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:14 am
” In addition, "in Flynn II, Plaintiff requested damages and numerous forms of injunctive relief, all of which were aimed at ameliorating past retaliation against Plaintiff and preventing retaliation against her in the future. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
The court also addressed the carrier’s Motion to Strike all references in the Plaintiff’s Complaint that the carrier’s conduct was reckless, wanton, and willful relative to the declaratory judgment and breach of contract claims. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:40 am
The court additionally found that the Plaintiff had no obligation to provide UIM benefits to the Plaintiff based upon the Plaintiff’s rejection of UIM coverage for the motorcycle involved in the subject accident.At the time of the accident, the Plaintiffs were on a motorcycle when they were rear-ended. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined that a probationary teacher "may be terminated during his or her probationary period for any reason, or no reason at all, and without a hearing, unless the teacher establishes that his or her employment was terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, in violation of a statutory proscription, or in bad faith. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:45 am
The trial court noted in its January 2021 ruling that COVID-19 was running rampant, there was no cure at the moment, people were dying and losing their businesses, and all plaintiff was claiming was that he had to complete a form. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:10 pm
On October 19, 2016, Plaintiff sent a letter to Monster’s board demanding to inspect books and records to determine whether he should pursue litigation against all or some directors for alleged wrongdoing in connection with the Merger. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
A month later the roof failed, causing extensive water damage and all of the businesses to temporarily shut down. [read post]
