Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 2:46 pm
Nuance Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
As noted, an en banc Ninth Circuit asked the California Supreme Court to decide a state law issue – whether the state constitution is violated by a California statute requiring drug claims processors to generate studies about pharmacy pricing, summarize the results, and disseminate the information to their clients — about which a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel was in conflict with California Court of Appeal case law. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:58 am
First, representing what media observers call the nation’s most aggressive attempt yet to close the salary gap between men and women, SB 358 would substantially broaden California gender pay differential law. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
The California Plaintiffs are at the center of this appeal because the parties dispute the preclusive effect of the settlement from the California action: Lofton v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:01 pm
Menagerie Productions v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
Warren appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:05 pm
” In Iskanian v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:58 pm
In a recent California Court of Appeals decision, Trapasso v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
The California Supreme Court has added to this line of cases in Peabody v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Central to this case was California’s governmental immunity law. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:02 pm
On April 6, 2020, in the matter of Vicky Ibarra v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
On May 26, 2020, in the matter of Karen Fogerty v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 2:54 am
Cal.) in McDonald v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See California v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 3:34 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am
Grindr Online Dating Services Must Give California Users a “Cooling Off” Period–Howell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
The California Court of Appeals rendered an interesting decision in a recent case, Mata v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Source: https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-vetri/negligent-infliction-of-emotional-distress-torts-keyed-to-vetri/burgess-v-superior-court/Read More [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 12:13 pm
Law Offices of Leslie Jensen, 50 Cal. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:13 pm
While Vick’s case involved interpretation of the NFL collective bargaining agreement, how bonuses are treated is often a sticky area of the law for California employers. [read post]
