Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 8,753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
ABSTRACT: The paper analyzes Adam Smith’s views on monopoly focusing on Book IV and V of... [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
The '786 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Sonics v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
The '786 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Sonics v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:21 pm
Trapp & Alex Mills, Smooth Runs the Water Where the Brook Is Deep: The Obscured Complexities of Germany v Italy Francesco Messineo, Maps Of Ephemeral Empires: The ICJ and the Macedonian Name Dispute Thomas R. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
Housing and human rights The Nearly Legal blog sets out three recent decisions from the European Court of Human Rights on the subject of housing, including Bjedov v Croatia, Jarnea and others v Romania, and Costache v Romania. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:09 pm
Danielle Allen and Rob Reich, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012 (Forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Last year, he argued before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Davis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 4:02 pm
Does Healthcare Reform Require Hospital v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times praises the Court’s decision in Reichle v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:34 pm
As a Florida lawyer who represents injured children, as well as a parent of a 13 year old daughter, I was very interested in the recent case of Claire's Boutiques, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 10:30 am
"That's bull****," Mr Holder said in a confrontation after a cabinet meeting, according to author Daniel Klaidman. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Daniel Berkowitz, Katharina Pistor and Jean-Francois Richard (2003), ‘Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect’ 14. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:43 am
" Willy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
Posted by Daniel M. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:11 am
Posted by Daniel M. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:39 am
At least one thing is clear, a court should not give the AGC’s report deference under any judicial precedent, except the most minimal degree to which it is persuasive under Skidmore v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
” Briefly: Steven Davidoff of the New York Times discusses new questions raised by Morrison v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:42 am
The Supreme Court has not gone so far, see Minneci v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:26 am
Kinnison v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
