Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 5501 - 5520 of 7,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
 I have broken it into 5 parts for ease of reading. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
If this question is viewed on a provision-by-provision basis (i.e., would Congress have enacted Provision X, or Provision Y, or Provision Z absent the individual mandate?) [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:25 am
This particular Kat doesn't see why such use, which is not unlawful and to which the owner of X does not object, should not count as genuine use. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:33 am
I assume back then it was well known that a Will cost X and a Divorce cost Y. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:44 pm by Bradley Gross
  I'm thoroughly impressed by the Droid X's power, speed and ease of use. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:44 pm
  I'm thoroughly impressed by the Droid X's power, speed and ease of use. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:44 am by Elie Mystal
For all I know, the man really does think he has control over the sphincters of his people. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:22 pm by David Lat
E.g., instead of having A+, A, A-, B+, etc., a school might just have Honors, Pass, and Low Pass (with Low Pass given very sparingly).But does this brand of “reform” help students either? [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:49 am
Importantly, the increased risk does not justify the retention of a surgical sponge, gauze, or instrument. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:11 am by Mark Herrmann
(“I don’t care if I’m at Firm X or Firm Y, but I can’t let down the folks at Superior Products Co., who I’ve been working with for years and who depend on me. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:57 am by NL
I want you to be able to say ‘I think X’ and actually mean it  - both that this is the conclusion you have come to and that you have engaged in some thought along the way. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:16 am by Isabel McArdle
As I have indicated, there is a genuine debate about that (Elias LJ, paragraph 60). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:00 am by familoo
First of all, the Magistrates Court Act 1980 does give the court power to sit as a bench of 2 in family proceedings. [read post]