Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 5501 - 5520 of 8,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm by Michael Ehline
So, what does a safe driving plan include? [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:11 pm by Bill Otis
  Also, defendants often receive lesser sentences as the result of a plea bargain or for providing the government with substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of other defendants. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
The defendants also uniformly testify that Razzano consented to their entering his house, and Razzano’s sworn testimony does not contradict this.The parties also dispute what happened after the officers entered Razzano’s home. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
It stopped again when the district court dismissed the case on December 20, 2004. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 12:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b), 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   The complaint seeks to recover damages on behalf of the class based on allegations that the defendants’ alleged misrepresentations or omissions violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]
  On September 1, 2020, PlanetArt purchased substantially all the CafePress assets from Residual Pumpkin (the former owner). [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 9:43 am by Mark Ashton
In a criminal trial, when the defendant does testify he is open to a broad range of cross examination on subjects that can extend far beyond the crime itself. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:19 am by Alexis Hoag-Fordjour
Although the decision does not impact Cruz’s conviction, it entitles him to a new sentencing hearing. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  I’m not quite seeing the connection, and neither does the court. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am by Jack Kennedy
That does not mean, of course, that politically expediency should take preference over the law. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members.” 15 U.S.C. § 78n-1(c)).  [read post]