Search for: "EXPENSE OF JUDGES" Results 5501 - 5520 of 24,969
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  The first judge recused himself because of a conflict, and the second judge was disqualified by the Supreme Court after email messages criticizing one of the defense attorneys were traced to her computer. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 7:35 am
  Would Judge Block be eager to cut these expenses though further restrictions on capital federal habeas actions. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:01 am by Steve Hall
The alternative would be life without parole, which is a much less expensive and severe punishment. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm by Benson Varghese
The trial has been expensive in time, effort, money, and emotional strain to both the defense and the prosecution. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm by war
Given the (arguably) disparate reasoning in the 2 judgments in IceTV, the Chief Judge has to weave a rather tricky path. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm by Benson Varghese
The trial has been expensive in time, effort, money, and emotional strain to both the defense and the prosecution. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:19 pm by Benson Varghese
The trial has been expensive in time, effort, money, and emotional strain to both the defense and the prosecution. [read post]
6 Oct 2012, 3:36 am by Gregory Forman
 Everyone–the judges, the attorneys, the guardian–assumes such friends and family will say favorable things about the parent and if one wants the judge to know that these friends and family like the client the way to do that is to call them as witnesses at trial. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:38 am by jweis
  Judges may deviate from the guidelines when there is good reason to do so. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am by Ron Coleman
What’s the worst thing that can happen to a well-heeled plaintiff that wants to use the expense of defending, even meritoriously, against a “federal case” as a way to effectuate a “business message” (namely, you’re out of business, because we say so)? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
What’s the worst thing that can happen to a well-heeled plaintiff that wants to use the expense of defending, even meritoriously, against a “federal case” as a way to effectuate a “business message” (namely, you’re out of business, because we say so)? [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:08 am
For law firms, the process is expensive and time-intensive -- and still results in low acceptance and high attrition rates. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
The buyers later contended that Uni-Marts had made misrepresentations and omissions about costs and expenses to induce prospective buyers. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 7:30 pm
Who decides the "reasonableness" of attorney fees -- judge or jury? [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:08 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
In a recent case from the Eastern District of Missouri, a federal judge enforced just such a forum selection clause. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:08 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Joseph brings us selections from Judge Scheindlin’s new magnum opus on the subject, Pension Comm. of Univ. of Montreal, 2010 U.S. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jay Butchko
The judge can deviate from the guideline amount, either up or down, if there is evidence of any of the following factors. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Twitter's content moderation, LBJ's lies, and a judge's ruse.] [read post]