Search for: "English v. English" Results 5501 - 5520 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
He is mostly famed for his work in the 1930s on English Public Law. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:18 pm by Matthew Gardner
 I may not always agree with the result, but I can at least understand the reasoning.But in a recent ruling from Iowa Court of Appeals (Mohr v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:20 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Palmer’s comprehensive English translation of colonial Louisiana’s Code Noir of 1724 will be particularly useful to researchers. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:04 am by Jeff Gamso
  And the Supremes agreed.Yesterday, they issued their opinion in State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
 Indeed, Vogue was right and in fact today the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Fenty v Arcadia, confirming Birss J's judgment and holding that "the sale by Topshop of the t-shirt amounted to passing off. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Delaware marks 70th anniversary of its role in landmark Brown v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:39 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Today's guest post was authored by Jon Rehm**, Esquire of the Nebraska Bar.Former New Jersey Governor Chris ChristieLawyers on “both sides of the v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:14 am
The English translation of the Spanish or Portuguese word "MAGNESITA" is "MAGNESITE" or "MAGNESIA. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:39 am by Neil Wilkof
The decision in Singapore by Principal Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, Anne Loo (“PAR”), in Discovery Communications, LLC v A-Star-Education Discovery Camps Pte. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 4:37 am
Furthermore, that interpretation appears to be supported by the Court of Justice’s statement in L'Oréal v. eBay at [at 139] that such measures ‘must not be excessively costly’. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:35 am by Larry
Is it possible that I failed to report on the Court of International Trade decision in GRK Canada, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 9:13 pm by Larry
One example is Swimways Corp. v. [read post]