Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 5501 - 5520 of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2024, 1:13 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In it, I take as given the longstanding proposition that controlling shareholders do owe fiduciary duties to the minority shareholders. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  The failure by the House of Lords to address this issue clearly has caused difficulties in later cases, particularly Hutcheson v NGN [2011] EWCA Civ 808, Ferdinand v NGN [2011] EHWC 2454 (QB) and McClaren v NGN [2012] EWHC 2466 (QB) where this public right not to be misled has been interpreted generously to justify publications concerning fairly trivial immorality by well-known individuals. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am by SW
  Judgment was given under the old Departmental name, since changed to the snappy Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:08 am by Frank Cranmer
He was given the opportunity to appeal that decision to the Bishop of Lichfield but did not do so [55]. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Seminole Rock was a plainly correct application of Skidmore deference, given the case’s circumstances and the era’s assumptions about interpretation. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:09 pm by Chad Oldfather
  D, on the other hand, is very well aware that a given legal theory requires elements A, B, C, and D to be established (every single one of them), and wishes to emphasize that by God P has done nothing to establish C (nothing! [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:20 am by Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman
So far, the most interesting and puzzling aspect of Town of Greece v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:42 am by Jeremy Saland
You were arrested or given a New York Desk Appearance Ticket in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens or anywhere else in the New York City region for shoplifting, Petit Larceny or Criminal Possession of Stolen Property (New York Penal Law sections 155.25 and 165.40). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
That seems pretty clearly unconstitutional to me, since it doesn't fit within the narrow Brandenburg v. [read post]