Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 7,499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
Contrast that with (Winter v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 11:59 am
Assuming that she follows Dendrite and Highfields Capital v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
” The article explains how four states—California, Florida, Massachusetts, and Oklahoma—forbid judges from becoming online “friends” with attorneys who may appear before them in court, while four states—Ohio, Kentucky, New York, and South Carolina—allow it, albeit with caution. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reports that this issue stems a 2001 court decision in Zadvydas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:07 am
There is no such federal law, but many states – including California – and cities have such protections in place. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:07 am
There is no such federal law, but many states – including California – and cities have such protections in place. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:53 am
* John Levine: What are TLDs Good For? [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm
Judges not only honored, they actually defended, the Constitutions of the United States and of California. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:38 am
Behind the dodgy file-sharing numbers (Ars Technica) United States US General DoJ decides Microsoft-Yahoo deal deserves more scrutiny (Ars Technica) Phelps to stand down at Microsoft at month’s end (IAM) US Patents Open Innovation Network patent purchase is good news for Microsoft (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms jury verdict that Microsoft’s Outlook software infringed Alcatel-Lucent patent, but finds jury… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am
Assembly Bill 1307 AB 1307, unanimously passed by the State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom on September 7, 2023, was crafted in response to the court ruling in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
Bishop Iker's attorneys, assisted by former Texas Supreme Court Justice Scott Brister, show an entirely different landscape of "neutral principles" in current Texas law.There is a very good reason for this: for ECUSA, the law reached its pinnacle in the 1871 United States Supreme Court case of Watson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
California, 412 U.S. 546 (1973) centered authorship on “acts of human creativity. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
Dec. 15, 2011) (applying California law). [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:42 am
That's pretty good news, isn't it? [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:00 am
Arace v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Played that role even before Folsom v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:22 pm
Manuel award from the State Bar of California for pro bono legal services. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:14 pm
" See: From Tiny Sect, Weighty Issue for JusticesAfter the success last week of California's Proposition 8, which outlawed same-sex marriage in the State, the California courts will once again be called upon to decide the issue - See: Legality of Same-Sex Marriage Ban Challenged - Washington PostMSNBC reports on the coming same-sex marriage debate in New York State. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
Which is good. [read post]
