Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
I happened to be in the courtroom today for the argument in Doe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 5:09 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
Hester v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
Osborne, in which the Court declined to recognize a right under due process (procedural or substantive) to have DNA testing performed on evidence held by the state. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Dukes v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
A. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:29 pm
From the Fairly Used Blog For background, see Jonathan Pink interviews: District Court Invalidates Portion of Copyright Act as Unconstitutional; Holds State University and Employee Immune From Claim for Copyright Infringement (April 15, 2008) and Follow up questions on state university copyright immunity case - Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
In the case of Sekmadienis v Lithuania ([2018] ECHR 112) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that a decision to fine a clothing company for the display of adverts referring to “Jesus” and “Mary” was a violation of Article 10. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:31 pm
(The one beingConte v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:15 am
Essentially, the decision held that a complaint is insufficient to state a claim if it merely states legal conclusions and does not include specific factual allegations supporting the claim.Although not an employment case, Iqbal did involve claims of intentional discrimination. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
McNeely the United States Supreme Court held that police must normally get a warrant before taking a non-consensual blood sample to test a driver's blood alcohol level. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 8:27 am
In Henry v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:00 pm
Cox v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
On Friday, the DC Circuit held, in a 2-1 panel decision in Doe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court decided whether a state can require a voter to present a photo ID before casting a ballot (Crawford v. [read post]
