Search for: "High v State"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 35,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2009, 4:08 am
Today the Eleventh Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 8:04 am
Develop Don’t Destroy, Inc. and Prospect Heights Neighborhood Development Council (Brooklyn), Inc. v Empire State Development Corporation and Forest City Ratner Companies, LLC In these Article 78 proceedings, petitioners are challenging a modified general project plan for the Atlantic Yards Project in Brooklyn, a massive, publicly subsidized, mixed-use development project which will include an 18,000 seat sports arena for the New Jersey Nets and 16 high rise… [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 7:34 am
Love High Schooler’s “Murder” Tweet Isn’t “Cyberstalking”–State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:29 am
Kane of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado is uninterested in oxymoronic gimmicks, that much is clear. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
(Both Jan Luba QC for Doherty and Philip Sales QC for the Secretary of State challenged this point and it was not uniformly accepted - see below). [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:36 am
" Quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:17 am
In Omega Proteins Limited v Aspen Insurance UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 220 (Comm) the High Court was asked to consider whether a judgment that an insured was liable for breach of contract prevented a court from finding tortious liability within the same cover.In the earlier case of JG Pears (Newark) Ltd v Omega Proteins Limited [2009] EWHC 1070 Omega was held liable to pay damages for breach of contract to JG Pears for supplying meat materials which were only fit for disposal… [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
Quinn line of cases] High court will hear new cases on limits of personal jurisdiction [Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
The decision, R. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:35 am
CA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2278 (10 September 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a a control order which required the “controlee” to relocate and live at an address in Ipswich, away from his family in Crawley, was unlawful. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
" Vacation Exchange, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:05 am
"Guy V., this post is for you after our weekend discussion. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:23 am
Silk, William Savitt, Sabastian V. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
At the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at the big picture, with brief previews of the issues that could affect states, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times previews Holt v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 7:16 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:46 am
High Country News [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
Shahdad v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 3:00 am
The verdict there was considered high even though the injuries sustained by Henderson were catastrophic. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
You help close some cases.But it's a pretty heavy inroad into a pervasive surveillance state, eh? [read post]
