Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 14,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2016, 6:59 pm
Get your results, and see what makes YOUR personal brand most captivating. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:59 pm
I’m a big fan of Sally Hogshead’s books and writings on fascination and personal branding. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:10 pm
Like what you're reading? [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
January 11, 2017 -11 AM: In re Shabby Chic Brands LLC, Serial No. 85135970 [Section 2(b) refusal of the mark shown below left, for various goods in class 20, 21, and 24, including furniture, dinnerware, and fabrics, on the ground that the mark includes a simulation or design that resembles a governmental insignia of the United Kingdom’s Prince of Wales emblem (shown below right)]. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 8:58 pm
Thompson Reuters re-brands as the answer company leveraging Watson unveils E discovery point, practice point and perm id Start Stop Survey Product Results: Ravel Judges Analytics and Wolters Kluwer's Cheetah Voted Best Products. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:57 am
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:58 am
Whether you’re a toy company producing dolls in Shanghai, a home video company making DVDs in Guangzhou, or a luxury goods company manufacturing high-end purses in Qingdao, there’s only one approach that makes sense. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In re R. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:39 pm
They’re slow. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
Who knows when you’re awake? [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
Cipriani v Cipriani [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) established the following principles:is the use in accordance with honest practices (inc. a duty to act fairly re the trade mark owner's interests)? [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
Kraft Foods Group Brands, 16-341, Lee v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:48 am
My fourth proposal would be legislative action to consider imposing ‘due prominence’ – a concept developed in respect of electronic programme guides on digital television – for material produced by genuine originating news organisations in Facebook’s News Feed and similar systems, which would ensure as a minimum that the branding of the originating news outlet is incorporated within the Feed rather than the situation, as at present, where Facebook… [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:29 am
” Although “the joke on LV’s luxury image is gentle, and possibly even complimentary to LV,” it’s still a parody, reminding us we’re free to laugh at the mark’s meaning. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
And beyond the financial harm, the state’s very brand and identity were seriously tarnished. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:38 am
And yet, brands and bloggers continue to disregard the law. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 11:56 am
They’re great for registering things like slogans and “tropes. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am
Attempting to re-up during this, the uber-due-diligence and all-monetizing, all-the-time era of “brand equity,” Hugunin was detected at the border, presumably by the monitoring services. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:45 am
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
