Search for: "J Thomas"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 8,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Dixon v North Bristol NHS Trust [2022] EWHC 3127 (KB) by Nicklin J. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 13 July 2023 there was a hearing in the harassment case of McGee v Lewis before Collins Rice J. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
On 5 October 2021, Nicklin J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the case of Vine v Belfield. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm
On Monday 21 February 2022, Nicklin J heard an application to commit for contempt in the privacy case of Hayden v Duckworth. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
Marsh, J. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Research & resources The Justice Gap website is also supporting the ‘Open Justice Week’ initiative (see events, below) and has published a guide to reporting the English courts by Kim Evans, with input from David Banks, Philippa Thomas and Rupert Evelyn. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:46 pm
Deputy Solicitor General Eric J. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:02 pm
Fletcher / J. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
S. 391, 411 (2002) (O’Connor, J., concurring). [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:10 pm
"***Of the Coalition for Patent Fairness, Patently-O contains the following comment by Ronald J. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:43 pm
S. 438, 473 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm
§ 2000e(j); TWA v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
Exiled Irish patriot Thomas Addis Emmet and Thomas J. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
J. 311, 320 (1991). [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
Kerr is the Frances R. and John J. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
Fla. 2009) (J. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm
Galbraith, LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at AustinHerbert J G [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Binnie J. quoted Improver with approval. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
NOTE: The syllabus of the Court's ruling set out below constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. [read post]