Search for: "John Doe C" Results 5501 - 5520 of 5,531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
Applicant lamely contended that "'LOV' does not sound like 'LOVE' as the 'O' in 'LOVE' is pronounced as 'luv' (having a short 'U' sound) and the 'O' in 'LOV' has a short 'O' vowel sound ... and 'JOY' does not sound like 'JOI.'" The Board was not in love with that argument, and its response gave little joy to Applicant. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 7:26 am
Re: Pay    Let me draft into service as a spokesman for this position one John C. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 8:47 am
John Bace, Debra Logan, 19 1 December 2005, (C) Gartner, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 10:06 pm
Comptroller of the Currency John C. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:07 pm
Generals Zinni and Batiste, think we should stay: Anthony C. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 8:10 am
"TTABlog note: Eric Goldman's blog is the best source of information regarding recent developments in "key word" and other Internet-related cases.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
Instead it went directly to the default judgment.Trademark Rule 2.113(c) requires that the Board forward a copy of the cancellation petition to the respondent. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 1:04 am
From: JOHN C ROBINSONSubject: weblog postingDate: Fri 11/3/2006 4:41 PMDear Dean Velvel;I was rather bleakly amused by your post today - just a few days ago I read an editorial in our local rag that set forth a number of things that Mr. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 5:15 am
Do we really need a dozen more Seawolf submarines or should we have 50 more C-17s and C-5s? [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 6:22 am
If you are interested in more information on this topic or have any questions, please call John Randy Sawyer, Esq. at (609) 895-7349, or email him at jsawyer@stark-stark.com [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 7:41 pm
This suit against generics appears to fall in the same category as the general lament against competition and low prices appearing in Barry C. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:04 am
& C. 3rd 682 (1983), a state court ordered integration of Philadelphia's all-male high school on the grounds that the all-female high school and the all-male high school were "materially unequal" in facilities and education opportunities. [read post]