Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 6,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 12:47 am
If you thought the 1991 amendments to the Civil Rights Act were significant, consider the sweeping impact of new laws like these that have recently gone into effect: 1) Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act – extending the statute of limitations on a panoply of employment claims under federal law and effectively gutting the Supreme Court’s decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
Eastern, the Practicing Law Institute offers "Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:32 am
In the civil sphere, a somewhat unusual situation arises in Davis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:15 am
McCormick, Handbook of the Law of Evidence 806-07 (2d ed. 1972); see also Bazemore v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:02 pm
It is not disputed that he correctly stated the applicable law: [255] In Garcia v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
Both judges and lawyers can and do submit lower court decisions to the New York Law Reporting Bureau for consideration and possible publication in the Miscellaneous Reports. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:23 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:17 pm
As this was not a mortgage or security charge, the contractual and equitable right to redeem, Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Company Limited [1914] AC 25, did not arise; Welsh Development Agency v Export Finance Co Limited [1992] BCC 270, Lavin v Johnson [2002] EWCA Civ 1138 and Dutton v Davis [2006] EWCA Civ 694 followed. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
Davis, the extraordinary judge who presided over the ill fated October, 2007, first trial in Capitol Records v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:09 pm
Following law school, Neil clerked for Judge Paul V. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 8:46 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:10 pm
Larson (University of California, Davis - School of Law) has posted Four Exceptions in Search of a Theory: District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:41 am
And the law is in a continual state of change. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
Davis in Baldwyn, Miss., was not returned. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
See Kelley v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:31 pm
(To give only one example, in 2000, in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:13 pm
The judge in Novak v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 5:13 pm
Davis, 699 So.2d 999, 1003 (Fla.1997). [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Matter of Wright v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:21 pm
Davis For the Family Law buffs out there: The parent paying child support is entitled to reimbursement for expenses not actually incurred. [read post]
