Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 6,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2010, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 11:19 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:36 am
This issue came before the United States Supreme Court in the form of a submerged lands case from the State of Florida. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:10 am
The released guidance identifies certain factors and circumstances that the EPA believes will lead to a “discharge into waters of the United States,” which, in turn, will trigger the NPDES permit requirement. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:16 am
Can any state sue the United States? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
Because the dissent didn’t carry the day, Gates has immediate consequences for private clients throughout the United States who tear down their houses, and build new homes on their property. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:17 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
Finally, the Sixteenth Amendment speaks of taxes on income.In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
TITLE V–SPACE TECHNOLOGY Sec. 501. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:46 am
United States, 49 N.J. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm
This month the Guardian ran two opinion pieces on the presence of ‘sharia’ in the United Kingdom. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:29 pm
Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Auxer v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Our mission is to register every mortgage loan in the United States on the MERS® System. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
United States, No. 08-23001-CIV, 2010 WL 2730095 (S.D. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 pm
After considering the approach in the United States and Canada and the domestic case law on justification of interferences with constitutional rights she concluded that a rule which placed the burden of proving falsity on the plaintiff would put his constitutional rights to dignity at risk [52]. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
