Search for: "Laws v. State" Results 5501 - 5520 of 155,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 7:38 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Failure to provide notice of address change In 2006, appellant, Robert Douglas More, was convicted of fourth degree sexual offense and second degree assault in the Circuit Court for Howard County as a result of acts committed in October 2005. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 7:15 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence –Possession of firearm by prohibited person George Nash Briscoe, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County of possession of a regulated firearm by a prohibited person, possession of ammunition by a prohibited person, and possession of a controlled dangerous substance (“CDS”). [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:23 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Attempted armed robbery Jonathan Sandoval Osses, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Washington County with attempted armed robbery, first-degree assault, use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, and other related offenses. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:34 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Theft of property under $1,000 Appellant, John Albert Barton, III, was tried and convicted, in his first trial, involving separate victims, of theft of property with a value of at least $1,000 but less than $10,000 by a jury in the Circuit Court for Cecil County (Sexton, ... [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:23 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Carrying dangerous weapon with intent to injure Convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Charles County, of second degree assault and carrying a dangerous weapon with the intent to injure, James Macauthur Spears contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his weapons conviction. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree murder Appellant, Jaymarri Rodney Boykin, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County of first-degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, illegal possession of a regulated firearm, firearm possession by a minor, and wearing, ... [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:11 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Possession of firearm by prohibited person Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Willie Alfred Harris III, appellant, was convicted of possession of a regulated firearm by a prohibited person. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 7:59 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — First-degree murder Appellant, Juliun E. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:06 am by Tom Baden
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Four-time offender After a trial before a jury of the Circuit Court for Allegany County, Donte Isaiah McKenny was convicted of possession of heroin with the intent to distribute, possession of crack cocaine with the intent to distribute, two counts of conspiracy to possess those controlled dangerous ... [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:20 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Unmerged convictions Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Harford County, Carl Robert Alexander, appellant, was convicted of voluntary manslaughter; first-degree assault; use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence; wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun; possession of ammunition; and possession of […] [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:51 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Assault and use of firarm Appellant, Robert Eugene Booth, Jr., was convicted in the Circuit Court of Anne Arundel County of two counts of first degree assault, two counts of second degree assault, two counts of reckless endangerment, one count of use of a firearm in the ... [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:15 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Assault, use of a firearm and kidnapping Tried by a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, appellant, Larry Adesina Oladipupo, was convicted of first-degree assault and use of a firearm in the commission of a felony or crime of violence related to an incident that ... [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:35 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Robbery and attempted robbery Appellant Monte Pierre Fortune was convicted of one count of robbery and two counts of attempted robbery by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County on December 18, 2013. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:59 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Driving with a suspended license Appellant, Shuran Latay Douglas, was tried and convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Kent County (Bowman, J.) of driving while his license was suspended, possessing a suspended license, failing to surrender a suspended license and displaying registration plates issued ... [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 8:21 am by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — Inmate’s petition for mental-health evaluation — Appeal not permitted by law Steven Anthony Powell, an inmate, filed this appeal from the denial, by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, of his petition seeking an evaluation by the Department of Mental Health and Hygiene (the Department) to determine whether he is in need ... [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:50 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Driving under the influence of alcohol and without a license Daryl James Goodall, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Garrett County of driving under the influence of alcohol, driving without a license, possession of marijuana, and possession of paraphernalia. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:05 am by Paul Caron
The Elon Law Review hosts a symposium today on Implications of United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Kerr argued that it was not a question of the law in Northern Ireland, but rather the law of England when the women were in England, and as such it did not impinge on the democratic decision of the Northern Ireland administration. [read post]