Search for: "Little v State" Results 5501 - 5520 of 26,851
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2019, 11:05 am by Steve Kalar
 Brave case of first impression brings intellectually-rigorous analysis to – challenging – sentencing fact pattern.United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:38 pm by David Post
" For the first two years of his administration, he accepted Congress's decision not to provide border wall funding with little pushback. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
They are permitted in the UK (but we do not see them often), and in other EU Member States, such as Sweden, where this case originated, as well as elsewhere (such as in the US). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:23 pm
The district court issued a preliminary injunction barring the enforcement of the rules in several states. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and  the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:19 am by Daily Record Staff
He argues on appeal that the circuit court erred in admitting a forensic lab report because the State failed to establish an adequate chain of ... [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
The Board rejected Applicant’s arguments, finding that these differences “do[] little to distinguish the marks’ appearance,” and concluding that marks are visually similar. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:36 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
The court also discarded numerous claims for unfair competition and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Safe Step Walk In Tub Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am by Cameron Malone-Brown
Little time is wasted in stating that the acquisition of rights with no intention to use, and potentially to prevent third parties from using the mark in relation to these goods or services, will indeed constitute bad faith. [read post]