Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 5,885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2008, 3:06 pm
The Journal of Accountancy published an article earlier this year that attorneys might want to consider as well.Entitled "Letting Go: Evaluating and Firing Clients," it is written by Mark Koziel, CPA. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Although Applicant admitted Opposer's use of its mark on some goods, "it is ultimately of no help to opposer, because opposer has not proven (nor has applicant admitted) when such use commenced. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
An objection under Section 3(1)(c) cannot therefore be overcome by a limitation to exclude goods originating from the place whose name they carry. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Discussion and analysis of WTO Ministerial meeting progress on TRIPs issues: (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Updates), Italian broadcaster, Mediaset sues Google for hosting video clips on… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:26 pm
The President however concluded that Montex v Diesel was a trade mark case while the alleged infringements before him involved patents. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 1:38 am
Consequently, physical limitations that still exist beyond the one-year mark are more probably than not permanent. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:30 pm
So, who says war isn’t good for anything? [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
Assuming the goods contain only depictions and no word marks, then the answer should be obvious. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:13 am
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:48 pm
The frustrated man will not be happy, and the unhappy man will not do a good job. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:11 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:48 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 4:46 am
How strange, then, that a matter as fundamental as the right of a shopping centre operator to register its name as a trade mark should have had to wait so long for a definitive ruling. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas), Three-strikes scheme… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:32 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 3:04 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized question comes from Jane C. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:57 pm
" As a reminder, the following italicized question comes from Jane C. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its application… [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
See Jane C. [read post]
