Search for: "People v A. M." Results 5501 - 5520 of 14,348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2016, 5:53 am by Jonathan Abel
This was the type of system endorsed by the California Supreme Court last year in People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:21 am by Andrew Keane Woods
European Community, but I’m not sure it needed to. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 11:09 am by Bill
") It would seem obvious that whether a record is kept on paper, or electronically is irrelevant to whether it is relevant or likely to lead to relevant information, but people still fight about it--  see, e.g., Gilbert v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Eugene Volokh
May 11, 2016); shortly after the decision came down, I filed an amicus brief supporting the petition urging the Eighth Circuit to rehear the case before the full court, but I’m sorry to say that the full court just last week denied the petition: 1. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:11 am by Lorene Park
LaFayette County Board of County Commissioners, June 20, 2016, Walker, M.). [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
  As the TTAB ruled earlier this year in  Noble House Home Furnishings, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 11:55 am by Eric Goldman
After all, if the people in charge of making our laws can’t respect them, why should anyone else? [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:02 pm by Mark Tushnet
I'm working from memory here, so I'm sure I'll make (I hope) small mistakes. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:32 pm by Orin Kerr
If I’m reading it correctly, it says that if you tell people not to visit your website, and they do it anyway knowing you disapprove, they’re committing a federal crime of accessing your computer without authorization. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
 There's not much of a constituency for the select group of people who kill someone and then burn down their house. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:50 am
But I'm not the one writing a letter to the Bureau of Justice Assistance. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
“ Paul Dacre, editor of the Daily Mail, summed it up when giving evidence to the Leveson inquiry – “I’m not sure that the Blair government – or Tony Blair – would have been able to take the British people to war if it hadn’t been for the implacable support provided by the Murdoch papers. [read post]