Search for: "People v J." Results 5501 - 5520 of 7,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2019, 3:00 am by Doug Cornelius
That’s a way to stop the company assets from being used to pay bribes.But from a corporate security perspective, the internal controls are there to stop people from stealing from the company, or using the assets to commit fraud or other crimes. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
" For the full text of the Court's ruling, see: Juman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:12 am
“Now we are surrounded by young people,” Monsignor Sakano said. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:21 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The Court held that when a legislator votes, he is acting as a trustee for the people, and is not speaking at all. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:14 pm by Elin Hofverberg
The convention specifically regulated the access to the regions of Troms fylke and Norlands fylke in Norway and Norrbotten län, Västerbottens län, and Jämtlands län in Sweden. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
The case illustrates another point too: Kitchin J records at [88] that "the positions adopted by DSS before this Court and the CFI are radically different. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:59 am by M Bates
Loukidelis J. also rejected a challenge under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:24 am
In Goldstone v Goldstone & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 39 Lord Justice Thorpe quoted Hedley J in the court below, who had "summarised the litigation in vivid language" thus (at paragraph 42): "1. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Broc Romanek
For an insightful analysis of how to interpret the vote, see Professor J. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:13 am
Should it be a contributory infringement to supply a computer program that was essential to putting an invention into effect (as was found in Menashe v William Hill)? [read post]