Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 51,352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2014, 4:26 am
The decision follows the Constitutional Court’s previous judgment, case 134/1999, on July 15, 1999 (Sara Montiel case). [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
A few months ago, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in the case of People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:21 am
Justice lawyers said in the notice (PDF) in Keepseagle v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 11:27 am
You don't get many "separate but equal" cases nowadays. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
City of Pico Rivera, Case No. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:51 am
Still, the recent ruling in Williams v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:41 am
Savage Los Angeles TimesYORKTOWN, Va. - Five years after the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 7:16 am
Supreme Court’s Moody v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:07 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Case Citation: Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm
The facts of this case are just as stark as in that one, but the “vilification” aspect of this case of a man who was released without charge certainly stands out. [read post]
1 May 2008, 10:38 am
Since there are few legal restrictions on consensual sex between adults at this point, however, it is not illegal for three or more people to cohabit, even if they regard themselves as married. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 12:17 pm
As linked on Sentencing Law & Policy here, the Colorado Supreme Court has come out with an opinion in People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 8:42 am
” Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am
Potter Stewart wrote an opinion in the 1974 case of Geduldig v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 5:43 am
In Debeato v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
STATE V. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:59 am
FlynnOral argument is scheduled in the Michigan Supreme Court for March 6th in the juvenile lifer case of People v Raymond Carp to determine whether the SCOTUS decisions banning state juvenile lifer laws should get retroactive application. [read post]
