Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 6,181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2009, 3:34 pm
In a case decided October 13th, Grogan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:15 pm
He was able to persuade the court that the DHCR regs were clearly wrong, when most people would have logically inferred the word "solely" from the statutory language itself and not questioned the regs. 5. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The tenant protections provided by the State's rent regulation laws have long been an essential measure to ensuring New York City accommodates people with a broad range of incomes, and today's decision means fewer units will fall out of the system than otherwise would have. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:30 am
The court first tackled the issue of destruction of evidence two years ago in State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 12:41 pm
Adler v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:58 pm
Rather, this memorandum is intended solely as a guide to the exercise of investigative and prosecutorial discretion. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:48 am
Additionally, the California Supreme Court addressed this very issue in Smith v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:26 am
(People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Dietary supplement claims must be substantiated by scientific evidence, the FDA has guidance for industry about this. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
Another of those rules, premised on the Equal Protection Clause, was set forth in the aptly named Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:39 am
Last week in US v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 9:00 pm
Rodney Wayne Bible v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 11:02 am
Clark v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
But in view of the fact that plaintiff's chance of prevailing at trial became less and less likely as the defense pressed on, no alternative is realistically possible.Miller v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
Something to which I can personally attest, having been held up at gunpoint myself in that fine locale (albeit not at a fast food joint).As far as I -- or anyone else -- can tell, Gilbert Vasquez and his fellow gang members killed Juan Lopez, without word or provocation, solely because they mistakenly thought he was a member of another gang. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:16 pm
., v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
We, as attorneys, are accustomed to getting a bad rap based on the sole fact that we are lawyers. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
See Delfino v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
One can say that a government has a duty to its own people over those not within its constituency, and therefore one cannot expect any government to ignore the immediate welfare and morale of its people. [read post]
