Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 178,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 1:12 am
The district court dismissed the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:12 am
The district court dismissed the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 4:05 am
Let's just say he's not impressed. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:19 am
District Court for the Northern District of California denied plaintiff’s motion to remand, holding that plaintiff’s claim for unpaid wages and overtime satisfied CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement. [read post]
When is a Mass not a Mass? When it is Seven State Court Actions, Each with Less than 100 plaintiffs.
13 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
The court is not persuaded by Dow’s argument that the statutory exclusion should not apply because it never formally moved to consolidate the plaintiffs’ claims; the court finds the absence of a formal motion immaterial in light of Dow’s request that the seven lawsuits be treated as a mass action. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Rick’s NY Cabaret Intern., Inc., 2014 WL 301357 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 2:00 am
Thereafter, before plaintiff responded to defendant's discovery, the defendant driver died. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
According to the court, "[t]he force of the impact caused Plaintiff's vehicle to rotate in different directions, roll over, and eventually come down on the driver's side. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:54 pm
Class Action Complaint Challenging Microsoft’s “Windows Genuine Advantage” Software could be Amended to Withdraw Class Action Allegations Provided Plaintiffs Dismiss All Class Claims and Provided Plaintiffs Reimburse Microsoft the Attorney Fees Reasonably Incurred in Opposing Plaintiffs’ Class Action Certification Motion before Plaintiffs Voluntarily Withdrew that Motion Washington Federal Court Holds In April 2009,… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:50 am
It turns out that on Jan. 17, a plaintiff steering committee went against a motion that intended to exclude David Kessler’s opinions against the FDA. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
The District Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to remand. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
Class Action Challenging Sprint’s Mandatory Arbitration/Class Action Waiver Clause Properly Dismissed because no Dispute Existed between Plaintiffs and Sprint so no Present Controversy, thus Plaintiffs Lacked Standing to Prosecute Class Action’s Claims, and because Claim for Declaratory Relief Within Trial Court’s Discretion to Dismiss California Supreme Court Holds Plaintiff filed a class action against Sprint… [read post]
6 May 2008, 3:35 pm
The law permits a jury to assign a percentage of fault to any entity which contributed to causing a plaintiff's harm and can greatly impact asbestos litigation, where a plaintiff often sues numerous defendants. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 4:55 am
The parties jointly moved to dismiss from the litigation 425 plaintiffs who fell within two categories: “(1) plaintiffs who have provided sufficient information about the alleged date(s) of their exposure to the defendants’ spray but who did not disclose sufficient information about their location at the time of their exposure; and (2) plaintiffs who did not provide sufficient information about their alleged damages. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:57 am
Attorney’s office. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 8:50 pm
Another topic at issue was described as: “Knowledge of efforts undertaken by Defendants, and each of them, to produce documents requested by Plaintiffs in Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:28 am
This was a potential due process violation, however, because plaintiff's lawyers had no notice of the call and had no opportunity to be heard on this issue. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:02 pm
See Jarchow, 140 S. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:24 am
This week a terrific victory was achieved by plaintiff Peggy Stevens of Missouri in her quest to hold Novartis responsible for covering up the dangers of their osteoporosis drug Zometa. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 10:01 pm
Romàn, finding that no intent to deprive by the plaintiff and no prejudice against the defendant for spoliation of ESI, denied the defendant’s motion for spoliation...Read the whole entry... [read post]
