Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 5501 - 5520 of 21,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007 For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Instead the Supreme Court held that Section 10(b) reaches frauds only where “the purchase or sale is made in the United States, or involves a security listed on a domestic exchange” (slip op. at 21). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:04 am by William McGrath
The Commission argued that the issuance of a Wells Notice does not terminate the Commission's investigative power, citing a 2005 Oregon case, SEC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm by James McNairy
 Among other trade secrets at issue in the lawsuit is the recipe for Thomas’ English Muffins, which were estimated to account for approximately $500 million in Bimbo’s annual sales income. [read post]